Well I am not a C++, VB or otherwise programmer, but I have seen the results of my projects before.
This basic variation has a command section requirement for the output file, and 3 basic functions, which two of them are repeated up to a set amount of 27. The command section will require 5 different functions as well, and the whole of it could fit on a single MS Word page, though two is typical for my basic variants. The basic variant is designed to test the core idea against benchmarks and personal files I have created to check for variances and what not. It provides a greater understanding of the modifications to my core design I have made. Previous efforts had a different approach using a similar core to the current drawn up example. The more advanced version, which I see as being required before all of the possibilities are done would require about 70 total functions, could repeat most of them up to 819 times, and would be guaranteed to be the slowest compression utility in the universe but would provide great statistical information to me upon it's creation. Do not ask me how many hours it would take, and I doubt anyone would try to make it except a destitute African Farmer from Zimbabwe, who would not know how to code it anyhow, for a mere $300 to $500. So if previous works took two pages on average, am I estimating the time correctly, or am I underestimating the time it would take you to make it? On Jul 24, 8:39 pm, Conrad Constantine <[email protected]> wrote: > As we all know, truly good proprietary encryption/compression , can be > written flawlessly in 5 hours (10 if you really suck) > > (He /DID/ mean ROT13, right?) > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Brandon Betances <[email protected]>wrote: > > > Spam.
