Great. Hopefully you've now learned not to correct others without verifying your facts first, much less heckle them repeatedly about said fact or facts. I wish you luck in acting rightfully upon this lesson in the future.
∞ Andy Badera ∞ +1 518-641-1280 ∞ This email is: [ ] bloggable [x] ask first [ ] private ∞ Google me: http://www.google.com/search?q=andrew%20badera On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Processor Devil <[email protected]> wrote: > well, I am not troll. If I am wrong, please tell me so, I am able to learn > from my mistakes :) > > 2009/9/19 Andrew Badera <[email protected]> >> >> Blaming? Sure I'm blaming. When someone tries to correct me, and I >> ignore it because they're wrong, but am nice enough to not tell them >> that, then they continue to HECKLE me in an "I already told you so" >> fashion over this pointless, incorrect point, guess what? I'm going to >> blame a jackass for being a jackass. >> >> Thank you for FINALLY doing the footwork to show that I was correct >> all along, and you were simply irritating. >> >> ∞ Andy Badera >> ∞ +1 518-641-1280 >> ∞ This email is: [ ] bloggable [x] ask first [ ] private >> ∞ Google me: http://www.google.com/search?q=andrew%20badera >> >> >> >> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Processor Devil >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Well, you are the one who is blaming here, I did it in a good will :). >> > This time I really have to say I wasn't correct. >> > I took the google tour and found out that x86_64 CPU's are now called >> > simply >> > x64 >> > little snippet here: >> > (X86-based 64-bit) Refers to the 64-bit versions of x86-based CPU chips. >> > Also called "x86-64." Intel's x64 chips are officially designated as >> > Intel >> > 64 CPUs (formerly EM64T), and AMD's x64 chips fall under the AMD64 >> > brand. >> > So I am sorry. >> > About my knowledge of processors. I used to program with x86 assembler, >> > I >> > moved to zArchitecture 6 months ago. >> > >> > 2009/9/19 Andrew Badera <[email protected]> >> >> >> >> About your terminology: I could give all of two shits. Quit harassing >> >> me, processor devil who doesn't know as much about processors, or >> >> terminology, as he/she would like to think. Shut up and sit down >> >> already. It's called Vista x64 AND x64 ARCHITETURE ALL OVER THE PLACE >> >> NOW F*CK OFF. THERE ARE FORUMS FOR x64. THERE ARE MICROSOFT PAGES >> >> TALKING ABOUT X64 PRODUCTS -- INCLUDING MSDN SUBSCRIPTIONS FOR VISTA >> >> x64. BUY A CLUE. JESUS CHRIST. Quit friggin' annoying me already -- >> >> and if you're going to do it, make it about A) something that matters >> >> and B) something you're correct about, THANK YOU AND GOOD BYE >> >> IGNORAMUS. >> >> >> >> You're smarter and more informed than the average bear, yet obviously >> >> still mentally crippled. Better luck next life. >> >> >> >> ∞ Andy Badera >> >> ∞ +1 518-641-1280 >> >> ∞ This email is: [ ] bloggable [x] ask first [ ] private >> >> ∞ Google me: http://www.google.com/search?q=andrew%20badera >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Processor Devil >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > x64... :) >> >> > last time I told you it is x86_64 :) >> >> > About Windows 7... now you can buy new Vista system with possible >> >> > future >> >> > free upgrade to Windows 7 :) >> >> > >> >> > 2009/9/19 Andrew Badera <[email protected]> >> >> >> >> >> >> 1. Why don't you know? What does the Microsoft website tell you? >> >> >> What >> >> >> does Google tell you? >> >> >> 2. Why would you buy Vista instead of Windows 7 at this point? If >> >> >> you're going x64, the issues you face will be approximately the same >> >> >> -- driver support. And at that, minimal. >> >> >> >> >> >> ∞ Andy Badera >> >> >> ∞ +1 518-641-1280 >> >> >> ∞ This email is: [ ] bloggable [x] ask first [ ] private >> >> >> ∞ Google me: http://www.google.com/search?q=andrew%20badera >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 2:33 AM, jack me <[email protected]> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> > Hi, >> >> >> > >> >> >> > have any idea about on >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Genuine Windows Vista(R) Home Premium SP1 64 bit (English) >> >> >> > >> >> >> > .net 2005 and upper versions can run ? >> >> >> > >> >> >> > I am planning to buy a laptop from dell but i dont know that, on >> >> >> > this >> >> >> > operating system version 2.0 and upper version of .Net will work >> >> >> > fine. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Please suggest. >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > > >
