well, I am not troll. If I am wrong, please tell me so, I am able to learn from my mistakes :)
2009/9/19 Andrew Badera <[email protected]> > > Blaming? Sure I'm blaming. When someone tries to correct me, and I > ignore it because they're wrong, but am nice enough to not tell them > that, then they continue to HECKLE me in an "I already told you so" > fashion over this pointless, incorrect point, guess what? I'm going to > blame a jackass for being a jackass. > > Thank you for FINALLY doing the footwork to show that I was correct > all along, and you were simply irritating. > > ∞ Andy Badera > ∞ +1 518-641-1280 > ∞ This email is: [ ] bloggable [x] ask first [ ] private > ∞ Google me: http://www.google.com/search?q=andrew%20badera > > > > On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Processor Devil > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Well, you are the one who is blaming here, I did it in a good will :). > > This time I really have to say I wasn't correct. > > I took the google tour and found out that x86_64 CPU's are now called > simply > > x64 > > little snippet here: > > (X86-based 64-bit) Refers to the 64-bit versions of x86-based CPU chips. > > Also called "x86-64." Intel's x64 chips are officially designated as > Intel > > 64 CPUs (formerly EM64T), and AMD's x64 chips fall under the AMD64 brand. > > So I am sorry. > > About my knowledge of processors. I used to program with x86 assembler, I > > moved to zArchitecture 6 months ago. > > > > 2009/9/19 Andrew Badera <[email protected]> > >> > >> About your terminology: I could give all of two shits. Quit harassing > >> me, processor devil who doesn't know as much about processors, or > >> terminology, as he/she would like to think. Shut up and sit down > >> already. It's called Vista x64 AND x64 ARCHITETURE ALL OVER THE PLACE > >> NOW F*CK OFF. THERE ARE FORUMS FOR x64. THERE ARE MICROSOFT PAGES > >> TALKING ABOUT X64 PRODUCTS -- INCLUDING MSDN SUBSCRIPTIONS FOR VISTA > >> x64. BUY A CLUE. JESUS CHRIST. Quit friggin' annoying me already -- > >> and if you're going to do it, make it about A) something that matters > >> and B) something you're correct about, THANK YOU AND GOOD BYE > >> IGNORAMUS. > >> > >> You're smarter and more informed than the average bear, yet obviously > >> still mentally crippled. Better luck next life. > >> > >> ∞ Andy Badera > >> ∞ +1 518-641-1280 > >> ∞ This email is: [ ] bloggable [x] ask first [ ] private > >> ∞ Google me: http://www.google.com/search?q=andrew%20badera > >> > >> > >> > >> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Processor Devil > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > x64... :) > >> > last time I told you it is x86_64 :) > >> > About Windows 7... now you can buy new Vista system with possible > future > >> > free upgrade to Windows 7 :) > >> > > >> > 2009/9/19 Andrew Badera <[email protected]> > >> >> > >> >> 1. Why don't you know? What does the Microsoft website tell you? What > >> >> does Google tell you? > >> >> 2. Why would you buy Vista instead of Windows 7 at this point? If > >> >> you're going x64, the issues you face will be approximately the same > >> >> -- driver support. And at that, minimal. > >> >> > >> >> ∞ Andy Badera > >> >> ∞ +1 518-641-1280 > >> >> ∞ This email is: [ ] bloggable [x] ask first [ ] private > >> >> ∞ Google me: http://www.google.com/search?q=andrew%20badera > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 2:33 AM, jack me <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> > Hi, > >> >> > > >> >> > have any idea about on > >> >> > > >> >> > Genuine Windows Vista(R) Home Premium SP1 64 bit (English) > >> >> > > >> >> > .net 2005 and upper versions can run ? > >> >> > > >> >> > I am planning to buy a laptop from dell but i dont know that, on > this > >> >> > operating system version 2.0 and upper version of .Net will work > >> >> > fine. > >> >> > > >> >> > Please suggest. > >> >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >
