Really? Do tell. I ran Visual Studio 2005 on Vista x64 from November
2007 through a few months ago with zero problems -- in fact Visual
Studio was one of the most solid pieces of software in my 64-bit
environment. Please tell us of these problems of which you are aware,
especially post SP1.

∞ Andy Badera
∞ +1 518-641-1280
∞ This email is: [ ] bloggable [x] ask first [ ] private
∞ Google me: http://www.google.com/search?q=andrew%20badera



On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 12:26 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Jack,
>
> There is a difference between Visual Studio versions and .NET
> Framework versions.  When you say ".NET 2005", I assume you're
> referring to Visual Studio 2005 and .NET Framework 2.0.  I'm providing
> a couple links below for your reference:
>
> .NET Framework System Requirements (starting with 2.0):
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms229070(VS.80).aspx
>
> Visual Studio System Requirements (starting with v2005) :
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/4c26cc39(VS.80).aspx
>
> At this point, I think there are some compatibility issues between
> Visual Studio 2005, .NET 2.0, and 64-bit Vista.  Don't get too caught
> up about it being the Home Premium edition either.  Below is a link
> comparing each edition of Windows Vista.
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windows-vista/compare-editions/
>
> As for OS suggestions, it really depends how you plan on using your
> operating system during development and personal preferences.  I
> suggest getting a few trial versions of prospective OS's and
> installing them on virtual machines and just playing around with
> them.  I'm including a link to Microsoft Virtual PC below.
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=04D26402-3199-48A3-AFA2-2DC0B40A73B6&displaylang=en
>
> Good luck!
>
> -Ivo
>
> On Sep 19, 4:48 am, jack me <[email protected]> wrote:
>>  Thanks Andy Badera,
>>
>> I have searched on google. Mostly i found that it is compatible with window
>> vista 64 bit. I am not sure that On home premium .net will be run.
>>
>> I am in confusion that on which operating system i should go for. My only
>> requirement is run smoothly .Net 2005 and upper versions.
>>
>> Regards,
>> jack
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Andrew Badera <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > 1. Why don't you know? What does the Microsoft website tell you? What
>> > does Google tell you?
>> > 2. Why would you buy Vista instead of Windows 7 at this point? If
>> > you're going x64, the issues you face will be approximately the same
>> > -- driver support. And at that, minimal.
>>
>> > ∞ Andy Badera
>> > ∞ +1 518-641-1280
>> > ∞ This email is: [ ] bloggable [x] ask first [ ] private
>> > ∞ Google me:http://www.google.com/search?q=andrew%20badera
>>
>> > On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 2:33 AM, jack me <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > Hi,
>>
>> > > have any idea about on
>>
>> > > Genuine Windows Vista(R) Home Premium SP1 64 bit (English)
>>
>> > > .net 2005 and upper versions can run ?
>>
>> > > I am planning to buy a laptop from dell but i dont know that, on this
>> > > operating system version 2.0 and upper version of .Net will work fine.
>>
>> > > Please suggest.
>

Reply via email to