Saying .Net 2.0 is obsolete would imply (be definition) that is is "no longer in use" or "outmoded in design or construction", neither of which are true.
In fact, I'd be willing to bet that the vast majority of deployed .NET apps in the Enterprise are built on v2.0 of the framework. On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Cerebrus <[email protected]> wrote: > I would agree, in principle. Since each version of .NET builds upon > the path-breaking features introduced in the previous version, it is > impossible to say that a particular version could be obsolete. > However, it is fair to say that the demand for individuals skilled > upon a particular version of .NET may diminish. > > On Dec 18, 7:48 pm, Jamie Fraser <[email protected]> wrote: >> .NET 2.0 is most certainly no obsolete :) >> >
