Lets try and not confuse things by using incorrect names for things ;)

C# has versions 1.0,2.0,3.0,4.0

They roughly match

.NET 1.1, .NET 2.0, .NET 3.5 and .NET 4.0

There was no C# 2005. You are referring to C# 2.0 which was part of .NET 2.0

On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 4:48 AM, Benj Nunez <[email protected]> wrote:

> It's good that you made a move to C#. It's a language closer to
> Java. :)
>
> I myself came from a Java camp, but I find C# more appealing and
> have been using it since.
>
> I recommend you use C# 2005 and higher. Among the features you will
> find useful here is the use of generics which is not present in Visual
> Studio 2003. I/We java programmers then rely heavily on the use
> of generics and MVC. You will find generics very handy.
>
>
>
> Cheers!
>
>
> Benj
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Feb 10, 10:59 pm, pablo <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi Everyone, Im new in this group, I´ve the following question
> >
> > I started with .NET 1.0/1.1 (2002/2003) and asp.net developing
> > primarily web apps , I used vb.net as my  first language but in 2006 i
> > moved to other development platform so, Im very out-of-date with C#
> > and the .net frameworks version 3.0,3.5 and the upcoming 4.0 .
> >
> > So, my objective is to start developing again webapps  in C# again but
> > Id like to ask you which C# versions is better to learn right now,
> > should I wait to the final C# 4.0 release ? or just the new version
> > includes new features?
> >
> > I´ve a book of C# 3.0 with VS Studio 2008 (From Begineer to Pro), so,
> > whats your opinion?
> >
> > My plan is to learn C# (the language) and after practices it
> > developing web apps.
> >
> > Thanks in advance, Pablo.
>

Reply via email to