Hello! I've just finished to rewrite articles and section pages for our section “Translate DDL”:
http://www.doudoulinux.org/spip/ecrire/?exec=naviguer&id_rubrique=59 As indicated in the recent weekly news, lots of modifications were needed and proofreading is now wanted! I changed the following articles: * “The translation job (English)” [1] * “Translating the website into another language (English)” [2] * “Translation files (English)” [3] * “Translator’s FAQ (English)” [4] I also changed the page of sections “Translate DDL” and “Translations Status” (http://www.doudoulinux.org/spip/ecrire/?exec=naviguer&id_rubrique=61). If you have translated these pages in the past (which is not mandatory), here are the diff pages of these articles: [1] http://www.doudoulinux.org/spip/ecrire/?exec=articles_versions&id_article=86&id_version=13&id_diff=10#diff [2] http://www.doudoulinux.org/spip/ecrire/?exec=articles_versions&id_article=60&id_version=9&id_diff=6#diff [3] http://www.doudoulinux.org/spip/ecrire/?exec=articles_versions&id_article=58&id_version=7&id_diff=5#diff [4] http://www.doudoulinux.org/spip/ecrire/?exec=articles_versions&id_article=87&id_version=22&id_diff=19#diff You know that no diff is available for section pages. I'm now wondering about the pages in the section Translation Status. They gather the applications translation status per application category. As Spip is caching images, the status graph of each application should be regularly updated, which requires additional manual work. In the past Sergey had the courage to do it. I'm not sure these pages are really useful, so I wonder if we should not just remove them and the associated update work. What's your opinion? Cheers, JM. _______________________________________________ Doudoulinux-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/doudoulinux-dev
