The idea is that instead of putting kids in front of screens that won't
give children much skills, much thinking, or even will just make them be
vegetables as we say in French (because they're just watching or
listening), we want to put them on screens that are like construction games
and require children to become the main actor. This is finally an inverted
situation compared to TV.
*[Diverting from passivity of other screens.

OK, how about these (I like  #1 & #4   :)
1. *[Interaction with the the screen; not just passive inaction.
2. *[Let them be active before the screen and not passive.
3. *[Activate them, instead of letting them vegetate before the screen.
4. *[The child becomes the actor with the screen, not a couch potato.


On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Jean-Michel Philippe <[email protected]>wrote:

> Thanks Richard.
>
> > [Name some, show the map?:
> >
> > http://www.webupd8.org/2011/01/doudoulinux-linux-distribution.html
>
> Good idea. The map could be easier to read but it needs enough space.
> Elisa, what's your opinion?
>
> Otherwise we can just list the most famous websites without giving the
> URL that could be really long.
>
> > *[Diverting from passivity of other screens.
> >   Returning interaction to the screen. {What do you think JM? Not
> > really sure. RH}]
>
> Yes, I don't feel this is exactly the same. The idea is that instead of
> putting kids in front of screens that won't give children much skills,
> much thinking, or even will just make them be vegetables as we say in
> French (because they're just watching or listening), we want to put them
> on screens that are like construction games and require children to
> become the main actor. This is finally an inverted situation compared to
> TV.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> JM.
>
>
_______________________________________________
Doudoulinux-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/doudoulinux-dev

Reply via email to