On Aug 1, 2007, at 9:47 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:

On 1.8.2007, at 18.43, Jeff Ramsey wrote:
Since my initial post, I have noticed this in my log file as well:

Aug 1 08:13:42 imap dovecot: auth(default): userdb (johnfowler,::ffff:65.174.242.248): user not found from userdb Aug 1 08:13:42 imap dovecot: imap-login: Internal login failure: user=<johnfowler>, method=PLAIN, rip=::ffff:65.174.242.248, lip=::ffff:65.174.242.66

I suppose this is the problem then. Outlook stupidly keeps reconnecting to server all the time, so if one reconnection fails I guess this problem happens.

So this "johnfowler" really should exist in your userdb? You could set auth_debug=yes and then see what is logged before that error. Also could you post your dovecot -n output?


Output of dovecot -n:

# 1.0.2: /etc/dovecot.conf
login_dir: /var/run/dovecot/login
login_executable(default): /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap-login
login_executable(imap): /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap-login
login_executable(pop3): /usr/libexec/dovecot/pop3-login
mail_executable(default): /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap
mail_executable(imap): /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap
mail_executable(pop3): /usr/libexec/dovecot/pop3
mail_plugin_dir(default): /usr/lib/dovecot/imap
mail_plugin_dir(imap): /usr/lib/dovecot/imap
mail_plugin_dir(pop3): /usr/lib/dovecot/pop3
auth default:
  passdb:
    driver: pam
  userdb:
    driver: passwd


And yes, issuing a 'getent passwd' command shows all of my users from the /etc/passwd file, and then all of the Active Directory users, including johnfowler.

I set auth_debug = yes. Here is an example to compare to the previous one with johnfowler, this one with QUINAULT-ileneyoung as the username; (QUINAULT is a trusted Active Directory domain, so I have to prefix the username with the DOMAIN for this user.)

Aug 1 11:58:47 imap dovecot: auth(default): pam(QUINAULT- ileneyoung,::ffff:10.200.254.110): lookup service=dovecot Aug 1 11:58:47 imap dovecot: auth(default): client out: OK 1 user=QUINAULT-ileneyoung Aug 1 11:58:47 imap dovecot: auth(default): master in: REQUEST 3 12173 1 Aug 1 11:58:47 imap dovecot: auth(default): passwd(QUINAULT- ileneyoung,::ffff:10.200.254.110): lookup Aug 1 11:58:47 imap dovecot: auth(default): master out: USER 3 QUINAULT-ileneyoung system_user=QUINAULT-ileneyoung uid=16777352 gid=16777248 home=/home/QUINAULT/ileneyoung Aug 1 11:58:47 imap dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=<QUINAULT- ileneyoung>, method=PLAIN, rip=::ffff:10.200.254.110, lip=::ffff: 65.174.242.66 Aug 1 11:58:51 imap dovecot: auth(default): client in: AUTH 1 PLAIN service=IMAP lip=::ffff:65.174.242.66 rip=::ffff:10.200.254.110 resp=<hidden> Aug 1 11:58:51 imap dovecot: auth(default): pam(QUINAULT- ileneyoung,::ffff:10.200.254.110): lookup service=dovecot Aug 1 11:58:51 imap dovecot: auth(default): client out: OK 1 user=QUINAULT-ileneyoung Aug 1 11:58:51 imap dovecot: auth(default): master in: REQUEST 4 12186 1 Aug 1 11:58:51 imap dovecot: auth(default): passwd(QUINAULT- ileneyoung,::ffff:10.200.254.110): lookup Aug 1 11:58:51 imap dovecot: auth(default): passwd(QUINAULT- ileneyoung,::ffff:10.200.254.110): unknown user Aug 1 11:58:51 imap dovecot: auth(default): userdb(QUINAULT- ileneyoung,::ffff:10.200.254.110): user not found from userdb Aug 1 11:58:51 imap dovecot: auth(default): master out: NOTFOUND 4 Aug 1 11:58:51 imap dovecot: imap-login: Internal login failure: user=<QUINAULT-ileneyoung>, method=PLAIN, rip=::ffff:10.200.254.110, lip=::ffff:65.174.242.66 Aug 1 11:59:06 imap dovecot: auth(default): client in: AUTH 1 PLAIN service=IMAP lip=::ffff:65.174.242.66 rip=::ffff:65.174.242.239 resp=<hidden>

Perhaps this sheds some light on the matter? Why is it trying to authenticate the user again at 11:58:51 when there was no disconnect after 11:58:47? And why is it failing? My guess on why it is failing is because the Active Directory Server cannot respond fast enough to handle the second request, after already handling the first, but I am just guessing.

Thanks,


Jeff Ramsey
MIS Administrator
TMI Forest Products, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
360.477.0738





--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

Reply via email to