On Fri 21 Sep 2007, Bill Cole wrote: > It's a very bad idea for a mail client running on the same host as an > IMAP server to try to access the same mailstore via the filesystem.
I don't know what you mean by "the same mailstore". KMail on my laptop has a Local account, and an IMAPS account. The Local account, which I rarely use, accesses messages on the laptop (such as system messages). the IMAPS account accesses messages on the desktop. This seems to me to work perfectly. > >> I still think you are missing something about how IMAP works... > > > >What exactly? > > 1. IMAP is not a file server protocol. I don't know what this means, so I certainly never assumed it. > 2. "What KMail does" is not a definition of any standard. I never suggested it was. But I use kmail, so what kmail does is of interest to me. I find KMail works perfectly with dovecot (I had some problems originally, because of the different directory structures.) > 3. (Only based on your description) KMail does not seem to share much > with common (albeit poorly standardized) IMAP client behavior. KMail works perfectly as an IMAPS client, in my experience. > A mailer shouldn't expect to be able to both work directly with a > Maildir mailstore through the filesystem and with an IMAP server that > is accessing the same mailstore. I don't use KMail on my desktop, except as an experiment, but when I do there do not appear to be any problems. My Local folders are kept in directories ~/Mail/Folder1/[cur,new,tmp[/ and are not seen by IMAPS. My IMAPS folders are kept in directories ~/Maildir/.Folder2/[cur,new,tmp]/ and are not seen my kmail.