On Jun 16, 2009, at 4:44 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
Now I wonder, why there exists "an empty set of rights" at all?
To remove all rights from someone.
Shouldn't "SETACL mailbox id" (no rights string) behave differently than "DELETEACL mailbox id" then as well? Currently it removes the ACL entry of id.Reading the RFC I get the impression, that SETACL should have three arguments always.
I think that's correct and it's probably an implementation kludge to even allow two parameter SETACL.
