On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 11:29 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote: > > Shouldn't "SETACL mailbox id" (no rights string) behave differently > > than "DELETEACL mailbox id" then as well? Currently it removes the > > ACL entry of id. > > > > Reading the RFC I get the impression, that SETACL should have three > > arguments always. > > I think that's correct and it's probably an implementation kludge to > even allow two parameter SETACL.
Looks like there was a generic IMAP parser bug that caused SETACL to not give an error with two parameters. That's fixed now. Also empty rights handling is fixed too.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
