On 15.1.2013, at 21.05, Dave McGuire <[email protected]> wrote: > On 01/15/2013 01:51 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: >> NOTE: The squat code is quite slow for large mailboxes. There are also a >> few bugs that are unlikely to be fixed. In v2.1+ it's recommended to use >> fts-lucene instead. > > I'm running 2.1 and have just set up fts_solr. Should I scrap that > and move to Lucene?
No, Solr is even better.
