On 01/16/2013 12:17 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: >>> NOTE: The squat code is quite slow for large mailboxes. There are also a >>> few bugs that are unlikely to be fixed. In v2.1+ it's recommended to use >>> fts-lucene instead. >> >> I'm running 2.1 and have just set up fts_solr. Should I scrap that >> and move to Lucene? > > No, Solr is even better.
Excellent, that's what I thought. Thank you.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
