Hi Timo Heiko Schlittermann <[email protected]> (Mi 14 Okt 2015 01:10:20 CEST): … > Ah, the information comes from the other director running. The other one > is using an unpatched version of dovecot.
Your patch for backend-certificate verification works. Thank you for the
good and fast work. Is there any chance that this will make it into
Dovecot's next release?
BTW: The ambiguity of 2001:db8::9090 remains. Shouldn't you allow
[2001:db8::]¹ resp [2001:db8::9090]¹ resp. [2001:db8::]:9090² for such
cases? (In case one want's to use IPv6 addresses instead of hostnames in
the director_servers option. (And probably in other places too.))
¹) Address
²) Address:Port
Best regards from Dresden/Germany
Viele Grüße aus Dresden
Heiko Schlittermann
--
SCHLITTERMANN.de ---------------------------- internet & unix support -
Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) - {fon,fax}: +49.351.802998{1,3} -
gnupg encrypted messages are welcome --------------- key ID: F69376CE -
! key id 7CBF764A and 972EAC9F are revoked since 2015-01 ------------ -
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
