> On 15 Oct 2015, at 00:28, Heiko Schlittermann <h...@schlittermann.de> wrote: > > Hi Timo > > Heiko Schlittermann <h...@schlittermann.de> (Mi 14 Okt 2015 01:10:20 CEST): > … >> Ah, the information comes from the other director running. The other one >> is using an unpatched version of dovecot. > > Your patch for backend-certificate verification works. Thank you for the > good and fast work. Is there any chance that this will make it into > Dovecot's next release?
Implemented also support for sending the hostname within director ring: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.2/rev/8e9cada0c8fc http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.2/rev/7f718c840aff http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.2/rev/5876ca2d63fb Although it's not possible right now to add hostname using "doveadm director add", so that probably needs to be implemented at some point. > BTW: The ambiguity of 2001:db8::9090 remains. Shouldn't you allow > [2001:db8::]¹ resp [2001:db8::9090]¹ resp. [2001:db8::]:9090² for such > cases? (In case one want's to use IPv6 addresses instead of hostnames in > the director_servers option. (And probably in other places too.)) http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.2/rev/c5c34c02fda3