2007/8/22, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Jason van Zyl wrote: > > > > On 21 Aug 07, at 6:05 PM 21 Aug 07, Brett Porter wrote: > > > >> To date, I have always been in favour of one trunk, and one version. > >> > >> I understand the need for a clear separate and for Doxia to be useful > >> without the site tools, but I don't think separating the releases was > >> the right way to do it. > >> > > > > I use them completely separately. I barely touch the site generation > > stuff in my integration. The site tools are completely layered upon the > > core. If they are going to be clear and separate then they are released > > separately and have separate trunks. I think people who currently work > > on them have never used them for anything other then the site plugin. > > It's also not hard to create another JIRA project. > > > > I don't particularly care if people want to glob them back together but > > they are functionally separate. I can use the core without the site > > tools, one is clearly and extension of the other. In this alpha state > > changes in the site tools require changes in the core but that should > > not be the case for very long. > > I don't have a need to bring them back together again. They are separate > if you look at their respective use cases. What I would like to do, for > this release at least, is to align the version numbering. That way we > can release the code that we have now, and all the 49 closed issues in > JIRA with "fix for" 1.0-alpha-9 will be correct, version-wise. > > In short: we release doxia:doxia:1.0-alpha-9 and > doxia:doxia-sitetools:1.0-alpha-9, separately but simultaneously. > > After the releases we can create a new JIRA project for doxia-sitetools > and move sitetools issues there from DOXIA. And let each project have > their own versions.
+1 for your proposal. Cheers, Vincent > > > >> - Brett > >> > >> On 22/08/2007, at 6:07 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > >> > >>> Creating a separate thread for release questions... > >>> > >>> Do we have two releases in reality? On one hand we have doxia:doxia > >>> (currently slated for alpha-9) and on the other we have > >>> doxia:doxia-sitetools (currently slated for 1.0). Is everybody OK > >>> with those versions? > >>> > >>> I am not. Having two different versions for these two will totally > >>> mess up JIRA. Therefor I'd like to use 1.0-alpha-9 for both, this > >>> time. If we want separate releases for them in the future, then we > >>> need two separate projects for doxia and doxia-sitetools in JIRA. > >>> > >>> In order for the maven-site-plugin to be able to use the new > >>> doxia:doxia we need to release doxia:doxia-sitetools. > >>> > >>> Are there any other questions regarding the release? > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Dennis Lundberg > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jason > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Jason van Zyl > > Founder and PMC Chair, Apache Maven > > jason at sonatype dot com > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Dennis Lundberg >
