Hello, To decouple header files, I have a case where I use different representations of a member function argument in a class declaration and definition. They are both typedefs to the same thing.
In the implementation file, I can include the right header file and use the typedef I prefer users to use. In the header file, I don't want to do this, and a Forward Declaration suffices for the class. Doxygen states: "warning: no matching class member found for". Of course, if the oxygen comments are not with the declaration, they don't make it to the output. Obviously, I can use the same, non-preferred representation in both places. Are there any alternatives? Thank you, Jonathan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Minimize network downtime and maximize team effectiveness. Reduce network management and security costs.Learn how to hire the most talented Cisco Certified professionals. Visit the Employer Resources Portal http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/employer_resources/index.html _______________________________________________ Doxygen-users mailing list Doxygen-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/doxygen-users
