Just some short statements, see below

On 03.06.2013 13:12, Zieris, Franz wrote:

Hi Raydhitya,

You should have received a preliminary reply from me right after your first request. However, I was ill last week so I could not compose my follow-up mail earlier.

I just granted you the permission to push new changes which then can be reviewed by the other developers. As every new developer, you are not allowed to commit those changes to our central repository yet. Your changes will stay in our review system until a senior developer approves them.

The first thing that comes to my mind when I read your feature proposal: That does not sound like Saros's main purpose. Instead, it looks like you want to add version control features without using version control. Did you consider using SVN or Git in your use case? For clarification: Could you sketch the problems your proposal could solve, which a workflow using Saros and version control couldn't?

http://sourceforge.net/p/dpp/feature-requests/107/
http://sourceforge.net/p/dpp/feature-requests/100/

Please keep in mind that I do NOT decide which feature should be implemented, so that is the task of Franz.

Best Regards,

Franz

*From:*Raydhitya Yoseph [mailto:raydhitya.yos...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Monday, June 03, 2013 11:22 AM
*To:* dpp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
*Subject:* [DPP-Devel] Asking Idea

I asked for push permission a week ago and still waiting for the reply.

Meanwhile I explored Saros using JTourBus and it's log and now I want to ask about my idea.

I'm currently an undergraduate student in Institut Teknologi Bandung which located in Indonesia. I'm interested in Global Software Development (GSD) and decided to make GSD as my final project. So, after discussing with my supervisor and researching for tools which help doing GSD project I found out about Saros.

My idea is basically adding asynchronous feature to Saros. The feature's use case will be when two or more programmers working on one project and they are separated geographically.
It consists of 3 features:

1. Record session so programmers can know their previous sessions;

2. Gives highlight to what have been changed from previous version like diff;

3. Asynchronous messaging like email.


The use case will be one day the programmers sit in a session together. Then one will logged out from the session first because of time difference. Next day the programmers whom logged out first can receive message from other programmers and his/her project synchronize with the change after he/she left plus adding color highlighting to the difference.

I tried sharing one project and when the remote user choose existing destination Saros will overwrite the contents. So my first question: is it possible to change this behavior to check the destination project similarity against host project and add the difference?

The host is sending you the files that do not match. How to merge them correctly and send it back ? I do not know, but to be honest we have massive synchronization problems / defects when the session goes beyond 2 users. Please keep that in mind when designing such features because they should work with N>2 session users concurrently (other users may invited during the merge process etc. pp.).

Second question, how about the concept of persistent session with predefined project and users? Is this possible?

What do you mean with persistent session ? If you leave a session(N>2 users) you are "out of sync".

One last feature my supervisor suggested is non automatic synchronization for some parts of the project. During one session, one programmer can make the project uncompilable at the same time the other programmer want to compile the project. Finally last question: is it possible to synchronize only when the programmer wants to do so?

The projects are always synchronized on sharing start and stay synchronized the full time.

This is currently a "mental problem" of Distributed Pair Programming. Most users only see the benefits of DPP but not the "disadvantages". You are collaborating on shared resources in real time and so this is a common scenario. It depends on the programming language you use. E.g: You can "run" Java programms with compile errors as long as the class that could not be compiled is not loaded during JVM runtime. As for C/C++ this will not work.

We already offering partial sharing mode (also not full defect free) which offers you the opportunity to only share a subset of files of a project where you can later add more files as necessary. This should help to prevent some compile
errors on some sides.

BR,
Stefan

I'll really appreciate any given help.

Thank you,
Raydhitya

--
Raydhitya Yoseph

Informatics Engineering

Institut Teknologi Bandung

http://raydhityayoseph.blogspot.com



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite
It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production
Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead.
Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap2


_______________________________________________
DPP-Devel mailing list
DPP-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dpp-devel

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments:
1. A cloud service to automate IT design, transition and operations
2. Dashboards that offer high-level views of enterprise services
3. A single system of record for all IT processes
http://p.sf.net/sfu/servicenow-d2d-j
_______________________________________________
DPP-Devel mailing list
DPP-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dpp-devel

Reply via email to