As the article notes, the "...antenna melted while increasing
power up to 100 watts....". To melt something, there is a need
for substantial power to do so, or in other words: power dissi-
pation in the antenna. This stands in clear contrast to the
other statement in that article, that tells us about a miracle-
ous "...80 to 100 percent efficiency of the antenna...". So, i
would not spend too much hope into this article as long as
i
have not seen a comprehensive technical documentation including
serious near- and far-field measurement data.
Herbert, DG7MCC
richard radke schrieb:
richard radke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterence to the drakelist gang
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, I know what your saying Lee....Won't be sending him a check any
time soon...But, sometimes "truth is stranger than fiction" hi,hi
Rick
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On Behalf of richard radke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Submissions: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Zerobeat Web Page: http://www.zerobeat.net
Brought to you courtesy of TLCHost.net http://www.tlchost.net/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
