Doug Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterance to the drakelist gang
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> I think a 4:1 balun would be more appropriate.  I think that is what the 
> balun for the MN-2000 had as an option from Drake.

Well, yes, it *might* be more appropriate.  Or not.  Depends on whether the 
antenna is short or long on the various frequencies of interest.

If it's short, then a 1:1 would be a better choice.  A short antenna presents a 
very low resistance and running a 12 ohm antenna (not unusual) through a 4 to 1 
transformer is going to be hard to match with any tuner.  If it's always long 
then a 4:1 might be better.

Also, the length of the feedline makes a difference.  If it's a length that 
would effectively transform low and high impedances into moderate impedances 
then a 1:1 would be better.  

If the feedline is near an even multiple of a half wave at any F/O then a wider 
range of high / low impedances will be encountered and either a 1:1 or a 4:1 
might work, or not, depending on the frequency.

And, finally, I must point out that there is a credible school of thought that 
suggests that using a balun on the reactive side of a tuner is not the best 
design.  Apparently, baluns tend to work best at their design impedance, losing 
efficiency as the reactive component of the circuit increases.  Certainly, any 
balun so placed should be *way* overrated to minimize losses.

If it were me, I'd go with a feedline of 31 or 93 feet long (assuming an open 
wire feedline velocity factor of 0.88) and use a BIG 1:1 balun.  But, it's not 
me and this advice is worth no more, and maybe less, than what you paid for it..

73 and see ya on the air!
-Doug, W7KF


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Submissions:        [email protected]
Unsubscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:    [EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Zerobeat Web Page:  www.zerobeat.net - sponsored by www.tlchost.net
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to