"Al Parker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterance to the drakelist gang
----------------------------------------------------------------------
try to tell all that to those xxxxxs that camp on 14.295 +- 4kc all day &
nite.
73,
Al, W8UT
certified grouch

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "don" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Craig Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "drake"
<[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 5:51 PM
Subject: Re: [drakelist] TR-7 transmit audio saga


>
> "don" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterance to the drakelist gang
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>       I think a lot of people do not realize how important it is for the
ALC
> to be set correctly, or even on the conservative side. While a scope
will
> show flat topping, they don't show bandspread very well, and few of us
can
> afford a good spectrum analyzer to really see what's going on. With that
> being the case I have seen many hams brag about how strong their rig is,
> when in fact the ALC is set too far and that extra 50watts is just going
> towards splatter. I would rather operate at 90-95 watts and know that I
have
> a good clean understandable signal, than be at 100-120 and have to
repeat
> everything I say.  If I really need the extra power, 10 or 20 watts
probably
> will not make difference, that's when the amp comes into play!!
>     This just shows how very important it is to have good quality,
> calibrated, test equipment on hand when performing repairs or
alignments.
> and even then, double check!  does the reading on the watt meter match
with
> your scope?, is that old dummy load still 50 ohms?, how about the coax
> jumpers? just how old are they anyway??  so often there is thousands of
> dollars in radios, and yet the $5 jumper is garbage. or the 100 watt
dummy
> load has regular been subjected to 150+ watts for extended time. or we
> expect accurate readings from the 30-40 year old meter we bought off
> e-bay!!!
>
>       Having recently had similar issues, I have been aggressively
> "remodeling" my radio/work bench. all new jumpers made, fresh coax and
> connectors to the antennas, new and better quality antenna switches, new
> transmatch(currently homebrewing), oscope, dvm, cap meter, and new
wattmeter
> next month, and even reworking the shack's ground system.
>
> Thanks for the update !!
>
> 73 Don Ke7ffm
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
>
> From: "Craig Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "drake" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 8:58 AM
> Subject: [drakelist] TR-7 transmit audio saga
>
>
> >
> > Craig Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterance to the
drakelist
> > gang
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > As you may recall, I was complaining recently of RF contamination of
my
> > TR-7's transmitted audio.  The problem was traced to my "aftermarket"
PTT
> > footswitch with unshielded leads.  Removal of the footswitch cleaned
up
> > the audio considerably -- but not entirely.  I was still getting
reports
> > of minor distortion.  Some said I still had a little RF in my signal.
> > Others described a quality that sounded like clipping.
> > Then I remembered that I had installed a one-resistor mod on the ALC
board
> > that tightened up the decay time.  Could this be the problem?
> >
> > I clipped out the added resistor.
> > I also re-aligned the transmitter section using a newly calibrated
Bird 43
> > wattmeter and learned -- to my surprise -- that the old military
surplus
> > wattmeter I had used to align the transmitter a few weeks ago was
reading
> > almost 30 watts low. Therefore, my original transmitter power output
and
> > ALC settings were based on a real power output of over 150 watts on 20
> > meters, rather than the recommended 120 watts or so.  (My TR-7 had
arrived
> > at my door tweaked to put out over 200 watts and exhibited all kinds
of
> > weirdnesses, so even my first, faulty re-alignment had been an
> > improvement).
> >
> > Anyway, re-aligning the transmitter with the correct, lower power
output
> > and appropriate ALC setting cleaned up the audio completely and I'm
now
> > getting reports of excellent, "broadcast quality" transmissions with a
> > Heil Classic mike.
> >
> > I really don't know if the now-removed ALC mod was contributing to the
> > problem or not -- but I think I'll just leave well enough alone.
> >
> > Apparently it is my mission in life to screw up so you don't have to.
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > Craig
> > W3CRR
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Submissions:        [email protected]
> Unsubscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist
in body
> Hopelessly Lost:    [EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
> Zerobeat Web Page:  www.zerobeat.net - sponsored by www.tlchost.net
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Submissions:        [email protected]
Unsubscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:    [EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Zerobeat Web Page:  www.zerobeat.net - sponsored by www.tlchost.net
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to