"Howard Traxler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterance to the drakelist gang
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks Garey, I read that when you first posted it; but I guess I didn't 
understand it, the part about the filters anyway.  Guess I'll put the R-4C 
back on the bench and do some listening.  Is there a way to make it (or the 
R-4A tranceive with the TR-4?  I don't know which model of the tR-4 I have 
but it works just fine except the receiver is too wide for me on SSB and too 
narrow on AM.

Thanks again.

73, de Howard, WA9RYF
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Garey Barrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 8:52 PM
Subject: Re: [drakelist] R-4A vs R-4C


:
: Garey Barrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterance to the drakelist 
gang
: ----------------------------------------------------------------------
: Howard -
:
: Here's an extract from an earlier post I made about the R-4 series
: receivers.
:
: The R-4 is almost a 2-B, just with a linear PTO and 1 kHz dial
: calibration.  All tubes.  Very similar in operation, and will
: transceive with the matching T-4X for an excellent CW station.  Four
: filter bandwidths, (400, 1200, 2400 and 4800 Hz,) passband tuning, noise
: blanker, LC notch and 100 kHz crystal calibrator built in.
:
: The R-4A (early 13 tube model) is an improved R-4, almost identical
: specifications.  PTO and Band Oscillators converted to solid state.
:
: The R-4A (late 11 tube model) almost identical specifications.  Product
: detector, BFO, AGC and low level audio stages converted to solid state.
:
: The R-4B (early) is very similar to the late R-4A, minor modifications
: and crystal calibrator multivibrator for 25 kHz markers.
:
: The R-4B (late) almost identical except PTO changed from bipolar to FET.
:
: The R-4C (early) very similar, except IF filters changed to crystal
: filters.  Only the 2.3 kHz filter is standard, 250, 500, 1800, 4000 and
: 6000 Hz BW are available as options.  The 4000 & 6000 Hz filters are
: normally installed in a special socket under the chassis and are
: effective on AM only.  Four position filter switch.  The noise blanker
: was optional.  Entire audio chain solid state, tubes used only from RF
: to IF, all other stages and oscillators solid state.
:
: The R-4C (late) same.  Five position filter switch.
:
: The 2-B through the R-4B used L-C filters in the IF.  This type of
: filter has much gentler slopes, which means that nearby signals are
: still heard, just at reduced levels.   The crystal filters are steep
: sided, more like the crystal filters in today's receivers.
: Personally, I prefer the L-C filters for all except heavy duty contest
: use.  I like to hear what is going on around my frequency, instead of
: "listening with blinders on"...
:
: The T-4 series transmitters are all pretty much the same, the T-4X had 4
: pole crystal filters while the T-4XB and C had 8 pole filters.  The
: later ones therefore had slightly better carrier and unwanted sideband
: suppression, neither of which has ANY effect on CW operation.
: ANY 4 series receiver will transceive with ANY 4 series transmitter, mix
: and match.  There are minor things like the B line had a neon indicator
: light under the dial to show which PTO was controlling in transceive
: while the C line just turned the dial lamps on or off.  The R-4 and R-4A
: had neither, so you had to look at the switch!
:
: My opinion.....  The R-4B is probably the best receiver overall.  It has
: great audio, smooth AGC, all the filters and noise blanker are built
: in.  The L-C filters are not quite as "drop off the table" selective,
: but I prefer that for casual QSOs.
:
: The R-4C has poorer audio, a little harsher, the "better" (?) crystal
: filters are extra, and the noise blanker is extra.
:
: The R-4 and R-4A are just earlier iterations of the R-4B, and are not
: quite as refined, although some say they prefer the early R-4A to the
: R-4B because the tube type product detector in the R-4A is "cleaner".
:
: 73, Garey - K4OAH
: Glen Allen, VA
:
: Drake 2-B, 4-B & C-Line Service Supplement CDs
: <www.k4oah.com>
:
:
:
: Howard Traxler wrote:
: > "Howard Traxler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterance to the 
drakelist gang
: > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
: > Hi again all.  Here's a question that will require, probably a 
subjective
: > answer:
: >
: > For about 30 years, I used an R-4A and loved it.  I now aquired an
: > R-4C--without any of those plug-in filters.  I don't like it much at 
all.
: > So I got another R-4A and was hoping to tweak it up to be like the one I
: > used to have.
: >
: > Question:  Why did I not need those filters in the R-4A and will I like 
the
: > R-4C more if I get the filters for it?  Which receiver should I put my
: > effort into?  I like to work both SSB and CW.
: >
: > Thoughts anyone?  Thank you much.
: >
: > 73, DE Howard, WA9RYF
: >
: >
:
: ----------------------------------------------------------------------
: Submissions:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Unsubscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
: Hopelessly Lost:    [EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
: Zerobeat Web Page:  www.zerobeat.net - sponsored by www.tlchost.net
: ----------------------------------------------------------------------
:
:
: -- 
: No virus found in this incoming message.
: Checked by AVG Free Edition.
: Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.9/1157 - Release Date: 
11/28/2007 12:29 PM
:
: 


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Submissions:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:    [EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Zerobeat Web Page:  www.zerobeat.net - sponsored by www.tlchost.net
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to