Bah, my apologies to the list, it works out on the nose,
sorry for the wasted bandwidth.

   Chuck, K1OM

On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 8:08 PM, Chuck Grandgent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> never mind, I had 88uH instead of mH.  But that still gives 1200Hz, not
> 380...
>    Chuck, K1OM
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 7:44 PM, Chuck Grandgent <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> what am I doing wrong ?
>> 1/(2*pi * square root of (LC)) (from memory), with those values I get
>> 12000hz
>>
>>    Chuck, K1OM
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 2:25 PM, EP Swynar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>  Hi All,
>>>
>>> Saving --- and READING! --- past issues of old radio magazines can be
>>> certainly worth the space and effort...
>>>
>>> To-day, in the October 1970 issue of HAM RADIO (pp. 44 - 46), I stumbled
>>> upon a short piece by W4NVK entitled, "The Simplest Audio Filter".
>>>
>>> And simple it is, indeed...!
>>>
>>> Following the parameters therein for a 380-Hz CW audio frequency, I
>>> connected an 88-mH torroid coil in series with a 2-ufd. capacitor in the
>>> speaker lead of my Drake R-4 receiver...the results are REALLY quite
>>> amazing, and surprisingly effective.
>>>
>>> There are parameters given for CW frequencies of 1200-Hz, down to 380-Hz,
>>> but my ear prefers the lower tones, so I stuck with those particular values.
>>>
>>> If you have a spare 88-mH toroid laying about, along with some extra
>>> capacitors, this is a GREAT, easy-to-add-on adjunct that will only enhance
>>> the CW performance of your vintage commercial rig, or homebrewed
>>> creation...and it's OH SO EASY!
>>>
>>> ~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to