For the past few weeks, I've been comparing receive structures between the Drake 4 series and Collins 75S-3 series. I'm surprised by the similarities - as well as the differences.

Some obvious differences:

- Mechanical IF filter versus crystal or LC filtering;
-160m coverage ability;
- Tunable BFO versus PBT;
- Q Mult in 75S-3.

Similarities:

- PTO VFO with 1 kHz dial markings;
- Preselector (similar octave structure?);
- Crystal 1st LO (unlike early JA receivers during the same time period);
- Audio power and AF driver stages similar to R-4B;
- Extensive use of RCA jacks, including RF IN;

Collins, like Drake, used PBT in the 1950s and I'm curious why it was abandoned in the S line. Perhaps too complex to use among commercial/military/amateur users? In essence, the least common operating denominator wins?

Both series use the chassis for the filament return, although Collins used four (!) heater lines in the 75S3. I found Collins' treatment of the headphone jack quite interesting. They use a resistive divider network to load the output line during periods of high Z loads. Seems wholly unnecessary given that the 4-ohm transformer tap is routed through the H/P jack's N/C contacts and the 500-ohm tap makes use of the divider in which one resistor is bypassed during insertion of headphones.

My recollection of the S line tuning feel is sketchy but I recall a superbly designed VFO tuning mechanism onto the PTO -- probably at least as mechanically well designed as the those found in the Drake 4 series?

Perhaps the Collins S line has a slight edge with quality of construction and components although I've not taken a look at whether the 75S-3 uses ceramic switch wafers versus Phenolic -- and whether they used Teflon harness wiring (where Drake fails). I have nearly no operating time with an S line and I was considering a purchase. But based on what I'm seeing in the schematics, I'm not impressed enough to unload my bank account for a S line. This may seem like a "trolling" exercise to some, but I find the comparison between the two products to be very interesting especially when comparing cost and evolution of their product lines.

Thoughts on the matter very much appreciated.

Paul, W9AC


_______________________________________________
Drakelist mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist

Reply via email to