Hi, Erik Could you tell me what exact timeout feature they want? Setting Read/Write timeout when doing SOCKET-CONNECT? or Apply new timeout values to exist usocket object?
--binghe 在 2011-3-27，03:11， Erik Huelsmann 写道： > Hi Edi, > > 2011/3/26 Edi Weitz <e...@weitz.de>: >> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Александр Литвинов <l...@academsoft.ru> >> wrote: >>> There was the same decision at Dec 2007. Now, three years later, you >>> have not changed it. >> >> Well, I don't think it's too bad not to change your mind every year... :) >> >> Actually, I had hoped that there had been some development in usocket since. > > Well, there has been some development in usocket in the direction of > supporting timeouts. On platforms where timeouts are not supported, an > UNSUPPORTED-FEATURE condition is signalled. If that's ignored, > everything should just continue without the timeout settings. > > If the above is not good enough, could you indicate what more needs to > happen to make it so? > > > Bye, > > > > Erik. _______________________________________________ drakma-devel mailing list drakma-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/drakma-devel
