Hi Chun, 2011/3/27 Chun Tian (binghe) <binghe.l...@gmail.com>: > Hi, Erik > > Could you tell me what exact timeout feature they want? Setting Read/Write > timeout when doing SOCKET-CONNECT? or Apply new timeout values to exist > usocket object?
As far as I understand, the request is to for SOCKET-CONNECT to be cancelled after a certain timeout period expires. I don't think that's a read/write timeout, but rather a way to limit the waiting time until a valid connection is established. Bye, Erik. > 在 2011-3-27，03:11， Erik Huelsmann 写道： > >> Hi Edi, >> >> 2011/3/26 Edi Weitz <e...@weitz.de>: >>> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Александр Литвинов <l...@academsoft.ru> >>> wrote: >>>> There was the same decision at Dec 2007. Now, three years later, you >>>> have not changed it. >>> >>> Well, I don't think it's too bad not to change your mind every year... :) >>> >>> Actually, I had hoped that there had been some development in usocket since. >> >> Well, there has been some development in usocket in the direction of >> supporting timeouts. On platforms where timeouts are not supported, an >> UNSUPPORTED-FEATURE condition is signalled. If that's ignored, >> everything should just continue without the timeout settings. >> >> If the above is not good enough, could you indicate what more needs to >> happen to make it so? >> >> >> Bye, >> >> >> >> Erik. > > _______________________________________________ drakma-devel mailing list drakma-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/drakma-devel
