On Saturday 31 March 2012 15:08:59 Digimer wrote: > On 03/31/2012 02:25 PM, Lukas Gradl wrote: > > Am Freitag, den 30.03.2012, 12:15 -0700 schrieb Digimer: > >> Re: RAID 1; I've used these little adapters quite a bit in production > >> and have not had any heat problems; > >> > >> http://usa.chenbro.com/corporatesite/products_detail.php?sku=72 > > > > Thanks for that link - they look interesting. > > > >> SSDs are nice, but they are not enterprise class (unless you have > >> serious money). I'd recommend looking at 2x seagate 10k or 15k SAS > >> drives. Plug those into an LSI 9265-8i with BBU and you will likely find > >> the performance is quite nice, without inducing the risks of running > >> into early failure on SSDs. > > > > 2 LSI 6295 with BBU, 4 10k SAS drives, the mounting bays - that's around > > 2500 EUR. > > > > For now the system uses two local SATA-Drives with software-raid1 and > > this setup is more than enough performance. Is there really no cheaper > > solution to get DRBD up and running with the same perfomance than a > > local Software-Raid1? > I'm not sure I understand the question, sorry. > > DRBD isn't much slower than the native disk performance, provided your > network is fast enough.
I wouldn't sign that. While 1GB-network compares to current sata disks, the throughput isn't everything. There is also latency where the network layer in drbd introduces a factor of ten compared to pure local disks and when using C- protocol. And when there are many users/apps accessing this resource, its the latency that makes them complain. Have fun, Arnold
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ drbd-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user
