Hi, On 04/01/2012 11:57 PM, Arnold Krille wrote: > Its not the "network layer in drbd", its "the sending buffer, the > switch, the receiving buffer, the remote disk latency, the sending > buffer, the switch, the receiving buffer" of DRBD with protocol C.
if your DRBD setup comprises a switch (and hence probably lots of DRBD-unrelated traffice on the same NIC), the performance issues are well deserved punishment you're getting. Whenever possible, DRBD should use a dedicated back-to-back link. Buffers should not pose much of an issue then, either. Regards, Felix _______________________________________________ drbd-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user
