Even in that case I would prefer to assemble a new DRBD device ontop of the ZVOL snapshot and then mount the DRBD device instead :)
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Gionatan Danti <[email protected]> wrote: > On 06/09/2017 15:31, Yannis Milios wrote: > >> If your topology is like the following: HDD -> ZFS (ZVOL) -> DRBD -> XFS >> then I believe it should make sense to always mount at the DRBD level and >> not at the ZVOL level which happens to be the underlying blockdev for DRBD. >> > Sure! Directly mounting the DRBD-backing ZVOL would, at the bare minumum, > ruin the replication with the peer. > > I was speaking about mounting ZVOLs *snapshots* to access previous data > version. > > Regards. > > > -- > Danti Gionatan > Supporto Tecnico > Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it > email: [email protected] - [email protected] > GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8 >
_______________________________________________ drbd-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user
