On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 06:40:14PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Friday, 6 April 2018 17:25:58 EEST jacopo mondi wrote:

> > Same on the mandatory/optional VCC supply thing. Let's try to make
> > next version the final one. If the optional property with the dummy
> > regulator doesn't satisfy you and it is preferred to have a fixed-regulator
> > anyhow in DT I'll do in next version, othewise let's try not to change
> > it again. I'll just remark here that in the current Eagle design vcc is
> > connected to a power rail with no regulator at all :)

> I don't like the dummy regulator much, as it generates a dev_warn(), which 
> makes me believe that it's a hack rather than a proper solution. You might 
> want to ask Mark Brown for his opinion.

The DT should describe the physical supplies the device needs, if that's
a fixed regulator with no software control then the DT should have a
fixed regulator with no software control.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

dri-devel mailing list

Reply via email to