On Sat, Apr 06, 2019 at 01:06:07AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 10:56:40AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We've had for quite some time to hack around in our drivers to take into > > account the fact that our DMA accesses are not done through the parent > > node, but through another bus with a different mapping than the CPU for the > > RAM (0 instead of 0x40000000 for most SoCs). > > > > After some discussion after the submission of a camera device suffering of > > the same hacks, I've decided to put together a serie that introduce a > > special interconnect name called "dma" that that allows to express the DMA > > relationship between a master and its bus, even if they are not direct > > parents in the DT. > > > > Let me know what you think, > > Maxime > > LGTM. > > How do you propose merging this? I can take 1-5, and 6 and 7 thru > arm-soc?
You can merge 1-4, and I'll merge 5 through drm-misc and 6-7 through arm-soc Thanks! Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
