On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 07:18:26AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 09:44:48PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >     range->hmm = hmm;
> >     kref_get(&hmm->kref);
> > -   list_add_rcu(&range->list, &hmm->ranges);
> > +   list_add(&range->list, &hmm->ranges);
> >  
> >     /*
> >      * If there are any concurrent notifiers we have to wait for them for
> > @@ -934,7 +934,7 @@ void hmm_range_unregister(struct hmm_range *range)
> >     struct hmm *hmm = range->hmm;
> >  
> >     mutex_lock(&hmm->lock);
> > -   list_del_rcu(&range->list);
> > +   list_del(&range->list);
> >     mutex_unlock(&hmm->lock);
> 
> Looks fine:
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de>
> 
> Btw, is there any reason new ranges are added to the front and not the
> tail of the list?

Couldn't find one. I think order on this list doesn't matter.

Jason
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to