On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 4:17 AM, Alan Cox <a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote: > On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 08:56:32 -0700 > Robert Morell <rmor...@nvidia.com> wrote: > >> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL is intended to be used for "an internal implementation >> issue, and not really an interface". The dma-buf infrastructure is >> explicitly intended as an interface between modules/drivers, so it >> should use EXPORT_SYMBOL instead. > > NAK. This needs at the very least the approval of all rights holders for > the files concerned and all code exposed by this change.
I think he has that. Maybe he just needs to list them. But this doesn't change the license on the code at all really, so its actually not like a re-license where you need approval. But in any case I personally don't care about this interface being used if the alternative is they do it themselves. I'm still not going to debug things with a binary module taint. Dave. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
