b>> >> Alan please stick with the facts. This isn't a relicense of anything. >> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL isn't a license its nothing like a license. Its a >> totally pointless thing, it should be >> EXPORT_SYMBOL_USERS_MIGHT_BE_DERIVED_CONSULT_YOUR_LAWYER, but it >> really should be EXPORT_SYMBOL, and really consult your lawyers >> anyways. >> > > Also we should look at this > http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-mm-sig/2011-September/000616.html > > original code posting had no EXPORT_SYMBOL, so the original author's > intents were quite clear.
Yeah so a history research shows this didn't change until v3 of the code base, and I don't think any lawyers were consulted about changing the exports then, so I don't see why we should need any now. If we do need some now, then we needed some then thus making the original change of the exports a problem. Now how do I withdraw a Signed-off-by and have dma-buf removed from the kernel? (not I'm just spouting bullshit here which has as much value as Alan's, as I said before unless someone grows a pair and sues someone its all just IANAL and humble opinions.) Dave. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
