On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 11:40:07PM +0300, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
>
> The last two uses of mode->private_flags (in i915 and gma500)
> are now gone. So let's remove mode->private_flags entirely.
>
> CC: Sam Ravnborg <s...@ravnborg.org>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>
> Cc: Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
Nice quest.
Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <s...@ravnborg.org>
> ---
> include/drm/drm_modes.h | 10 ----------
> 1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_modes.h b/include/drm/drm_modes.h
> index 47d62b9d8d20..1e97138a9b8c 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_modes.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_modes.h
> @@ -348,16 +348,6 @@ struct drm_display_mode {
> */
> u8 type;
>
> - /**
> - * @private_flags:
> - *
> - * Driver private flags. private_flags can only be used for mode
> - * objects passed to drivers in modeset operations. It shouldn't be used
> - * by atomic drivers since they can store any additional data by
> - * subclassing state structures.
> - */
> - u8 private_flags;
> -
> /**
> * @head:
> *
> --
> 2.24.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
