On 20/09/2021 11:13, Christian König wrote:
Am 20.09.21 um 10:45 schrieb Tvrtko Ursulin:
On 17/09/2021 13:35, Christian König wrote:
This makes the function much simpler since the complex
retry logic is now handled else where.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_busy.c | 32 ++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_busy.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_busy.c
index 6234e17259c1..b1cb7ba688da 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_busy.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_busy.c
@@ -82,8 +82,8 @@ i915_gem_busy_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void
*data,
{
struct drm_i915_gem_busy *args = data;
struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
- struct dma_resv_list *list;
- unsigned int seq;
+ struct dma_resv_iter cursor;
+ struct dma_fence *fence;
int err;
err = -ENOENT;
@@ -109,27 +109,17 @@ i915_gem_busy_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev,
void *data,
* to report the overall busyness. This is what the wait-ioctl
does.
*
*/
-retry:
- seq = raw_read_seqcount(&obj->base.resv->seq);
-
- /* Translate the exclusive fence to the READ *and* WRITE engine */
- args->busy =
busy_check_writer(dma_resv_excl_fence(obj->base.resv));
-
- /* Translate shared fences to READ set of engines */
- list = dma_resv_shared_list(obj->base.resv);
- if (list) {
- unsigned int shared_count = list->shared_count, i;
-
- for (i = 0; i < shared_count; ++i) {
- struct dma_fence *fence =
- rcu_dereference(list->shared[i]);
-
+ args->busy = false;
+ dma_resv_iter_begin(&cursor, obj->base.resv, true);
+ dma_resv_for_each_fence_unlocked(&cursor, fence) {
You did not agree with my suggestion to reset args->busy on restart
and so preserve current behaviour?
No, I want to keep the restart behavior internally to the dma_resv
object and as far as I can see it should not make a difference here.
To be clear, on paper difference between old and new implementation is
if the restart happens while processing the shared fences.
Old implementation unconditionally goes to "args->busy =
>>> busy_check_writer(dma_resv_excl_fence(obj->base.resv));" and so
overwrites the set of flags returned to userspace.
New implementation can merge new read flags to the old set of flags and
so return a composition of past and current fences.
Maybe it does not matter hugely in this case, depends if userspace
typically just restarts until flags are clear. But I am not sure.
On the higher level - what do you mean with wanting to keep the restart
behaviour internal? Not providing iterators users means of detecting it?
I think it has to be provided.
Regards,
Tvrtko
Regards,
Christian.
Regards,
Tvrtko
+ if (dma_resv_iter_is_exclusive(&cursor))
+ /* Translate the exclusive fence to the READ *and* WRITE
engine */
+ args->busy = busy_check_writer(fence);
+ else
+ /* Translate shared fences to READ set of engines */
args->busy |= busy_check_reader(fence);
- }
}
-
- if (args->busy && read_seqcount_retry(&obj->base.resv->seq, seq))
- goto retry;
+ dma_resv_iter_end(&cursor);
err = 0;
out:
