Hi Tejas,
> > > @@ -1530,8 +1530,8 @@ static int live_busywait_preempt(void *arg)
> > > struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
> > > struct i915_vma *vma;
> > > enum intel_engine_id id;
> > > - int err = -ENOMEM;
> > > u32 *map;
> > > + int err;
>
> We could initialize err with 0 and remove err = 0 assignment below but
> leaving up to you.
that assignement must be a leftover from previous patches because
err is already initialized here:
err = i915_vma_pin(vma, 0, 0, PIN_GLOBAL);
will remove it. Thanks!
> > >
> > > /*
> > > * Verify that even without HAS_LOGICAL_RING_PREEMPTION, we
> > can @@
> > > -1539,13 +1539,17 @@ static int live_busywait_preempt(void *arg)
> > > */
> > >
> > > ctx_hi = kernel_context(gt->i915, NULL);
> > > - if (!ctx_hi)
> > > - return -ENOMEM;
> > > + if (IS_ERR(ctx_hi))
> > > + return PTR_ERR(ctx_hi);
> > > +
> > > ctx_hi->sched.priority = I915_CONTEXT_MAX_USER_PRIORITY;
> > >
> > > ctx_lo = kernel_context(gt->i915, NULL);
> > > - if (!ctx_lo)
> > > + if (IS_ERR(ctx_lo)) {
> > > + err = PTR_ERR(ctx_lo);
> > > goto err_ctx_hi;
> > > + }
> > > +
>
> Looks fine,
> Acked-by: Tejas Upadhyay <tejas.upadh...@intel.com>
Thank you!
Andi
>
> > > ctx_lo->sched.priority = I915_CONTEXT_MIN_USER_PRIORITY;
> > >
> > > obj = i915_gem_object_create_internal(gt->i915, PAGE_SIZE);
>
