On Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 07:26:07AM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> 
> > > + struct dentry *debugfs = debugfs_create_dir(dev_name(it6505->dev), 
> > > root);
> 
> I will switch away from dev_name() here, too, of course.
> 
> > >   int i = 0;
> > >  
> > >   while (debugfs_entry[i].name && debugfs_entry[i].fops) {
> > >           debugfs_create_file(debugfs_entry[i].name, 0644,
> > > -                             it6505->debugfs, it6505,
> > > -                             debugfs_entry[i].fops);
> > > +                             debugfs, it6505, debugfs_entry[i].fops);
> > >           i++;
> > >   }
> > >  }
> > 
> > Ni: I'd say, it's better to move this function rather than moving
> > it6505_bridge_funcs. LGTM otherwise.
> 
> I started like this but it meant to move all the sysfs file ops code as
> well. That was quite a chunk. You still prefer to do it?

Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.barysh...@oss.qualcomm.com>

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

Reply via email to