On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 05:10:35PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dyb...@oss.qualcomm.com>
> 
> In preparation to resolve the issue of hardcoding HBB, throw a warning
> if the value is being overwritten in the GPU driver.
> 
> The HBB value is directly correlated with the memory configuration.
> On platforms where more than one is supported, the value must differ
> for proper functioning of the hardware, but it also must be consistent
> across all UBWC producers/consumers.
> 
> On platforms supporting only a single DRAM setup, the value may still
> be wrong, or at least inconsistent.
> 
> Print a warning to help catch such cases, until we declare full trust
> to the central database.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dyb...@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
> index 
> eaf468b67f97ff153e92a73a45581228fcf75e46..ab812338739568d5908ca439e5c53e230a02de5d
>  100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
> @@ -637,6 +637,10 @@ static int a6xx_calc_ubwc_config(struct adreno_gpu *gpu)
>       if (adreno_is_a702(gpu))
>               cfg->highest_bank_bit = 14;
>  
> +     if (cfg->highest_bank_bit != common_cfg->highest_bank_bit)
> +             DRM_WARN_ONCE("Inconclusive highest_bank_bit value: %u (GPU) vs 
> %u (UBWC_CFG)\n",
> +                           cfg->highest_bank_bit, 
> common_cfg->highest_bank_bit);
> +

This really should come in an earlier patch...

>       gpu->ubwc_config = &gpu->_ubwc_config;
>  
>       return 0;
> 
> -- 
> 2.49.0
> 

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

Reply via email to