Hi,
On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 2:32 AM Jayesh Choudhary <j-choudh...@ti.com> wrote:
>
> @@ -1220,6 +1231,27 @@ static void ti_sn65dsi86_debugfs_init(struct
> drm_bridge *bridge, struct dentry *
> debugfs_create_file("status", 0600, debugfs, pdata, &status_fops);
> }
>
> +static void ti_sn_bridge_hpd_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> +{
> + struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn65dsi86(bridge);
> +
> + /*
> + * Device needs to be powered on before reading the HPD state
> + * for reliable hpd detection in ti_sn_bridge_detect() due to
> + * the high debounce time.
> + */
> +
> + pm_runtime_get_sync(pdata->dev);
> +}
> +
> +static void ti_sn_bridge_hpd_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> +{
> + struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn65dsi86(bridge);
> +
> + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(pdata->dev);
> + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(pdata->dev);
nit: you don't need the pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() here, do you? Just
call pm_runtime_put_autosuspend().
Aside from the nit, this looks reasonable to me now.
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <diand...@chromium.org>
