On Tue Jul 29, 2025 at 11:00 AM CEST, Chaoyi Chen wrote:
> From: Chaoyi Chen <chaoyi.c...@rock-chips.com>
>
> Let's make the ports nodes of cdn_dp in the same style as the other
> display interface, and match the style of ports's yaml.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chaoyi Chen <chaoyi.c...@rock-chips.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-base.dtsi | 12 +++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-base.dtsi
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-base.dtsi
> index 9d5f5b083e3c..edeb177bc433 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-base.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-base.dtsi
> @@ -618,7 +618,11 @@ cdn_dp: dp@fec00000 {
> status = "disabled";
>
> ports {
> - dp_in: port {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + dp_in: port@0 {
> + reg = <0>;
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <0>;
>
> @@ -632,6 +636,12 @@ dp_in_vopl: endpoint@1 {
> remote-endpoint = <&vopl_out_dp>;
> };
> };
> +
> + dp_out: port@1 {
> + reg = <1>;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + };Patch 5 adds a single endpoint to dp_out (without a reg property), so it seems that #address/#size-cells is not needed? If you run ``make CHECK_DTBS=y W=1 rockchip/rk3399-evb-ind.dtb`` it should spit out a warning about that. Cheers, Diederik > }; > }; >
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
