On 7/30/2025 3:59 AM, Diederik de Haas wrote:
On Tue Jul 29, 2025 at 11:00 AM CEST, Chaoyi Chen wrote:
From: Chaoyi Chen <chaoyi.c...@rock-chips.com>
Let's make the ports nodes of cdn_dp in the same style as the other
display interface, and match the style of ports's yaml.
Signed-off-by: Chaoyi Chen <chaoyi.c...@rock-chips.com>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-base.dtsi | 12 +++++++++++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-base.dtsi
b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-base.dtsi
index 9d5f5b083e3c..edeb177bc433 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-base.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-base.dtsi
@@ -618,7 +618,11 @@ cdn_dp: dp@fec00000 {
status = "disabled";
ports {
- dp_in: port {
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+
+ dp_in: port@0 {
+ reg = <0>;
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;
@@ -632,6 +636,12 @@ dp_in_vopl: endpoint@1 {
remote-endpoint = <&vopl_out_dp>;
};
};
+
+ dp_out: port@1 {
+ reg = <1>;
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+ };
Patch 5 adds a single endpoint to dp_out (without a reg property), so it
seems that #address/#size-cells is not needed?
If you run ``make CHECK_DTBS=y W=1 rockchip/rk3399-evb-ind.dtb`` it
should spit out a warning about that.
Exactly! Will remove this in v4.
Cheers,
Diederik
};
};