On 9/10/2025 9:25 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>>> I agree the `: u32` can be introduced later, the original `register!`
>>> macro did not specify any type information so there is indeed no reason
>>> to add it in this patch.
>>>> Yep.
>> When you introduce the types, can you change the syntax from `: u32` to
> `(u32)`? That way the declaration becomes
> 
>     bitfield! {
>         struct ControlReg(u32) {
>             ...
>         }
>     }
> 
> ... which at least looks like a valid declaration for a Rust struct
> that wraps a primitive type. Same for registers, if possible.

Sure, I agree with your suggestion and will make the changes.

thanks,

 - Joel

Reply via email to