On Tue Oct 21, 2025 at 3:55 AM JST, Joel Fernandes wrote: > To support the usecase where we read a register and write to another > with identical bit layout, add support to convert bitfield to underlying type. > > Another way to do this, is to read individual fields, on the caller > side, and write to the destination fields, but that is both cumbersome > and error-prone as new bits added in hardware may be missed.
Shouldn't the title be "Add support to convert bitfield FROM underlying type"? Since this adds a `From<storage> for Bitfield`.
