On 10/22/2025 2:25 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> On Tue Oct 21, 2025 at 3:55 AM JST, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>> To support the usecase where we read a register and write to another
>> with identical bit layout, add support to convert bitfield to underlying 
>> type.
>>
>> Another way to do this, is to read individual fields, on the caller
>> side, and write to the destination fields, but that is both cumbersome
>> and error-prone as new bits added in hardware may be missed.
> 
> Shouldn't the title be "Add support to convert bitfield FROM underlying
> type"? Since this adds a `From<storage> for Bitfield`.
> 

Good catch, I will fix the title for next posting.

thanks,

 - Joel

Reply via email to