> From: Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]> > Sent: Saturday, November 8, 2025 8:48 AM > > On Fri, Nov 07, 2025 at 03:10:33AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote: > > > To me, it looks like something generic, that will have impact on any > > > device specific driver variant. > > > What am I missing? > > > > > > I wonder if drivers that don't implement the deferred reset trick were > > > ever executed with lockdep enabled. > > > > > > > @Jason, @Yishai, @Shameer, @Giovanni, @Brett: > > > > Sounds it's a right thing to pull back the deferred reset trick into > > every driver. anything overlooked? > > It does seem like we should probably do something in the core code to > help this and remove the duplication.
from backport p.o.v. it might be easier to first fix each driver independently then remove the duplication in upstream? > > I guess it makes sense the read/write lock would become entangled too. > looks so
