On 1/19/26 9:17 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Code in dpu_hw_sspp_setup_format() doesn't handle UBWC versions bigger
> than 4.0. Replace switch-case with if-else checks, making sure that the
> register is initialized on UBWC 5.x (and later) hosts.
> 
> Fixes: c2577fc1740d ("drm/msm/dpu: Add support for SM8750")
> Tested-by: Val Packett <[email protected]> # x1e80100-dell-latitude-7455
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_sspp.c | 44 
> +++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_sspp.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_sspp.c
> index a99e33230514..80a9fb76b139 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_sspp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_sspp.c
> @@ -279,6 +279,7 @@ static void dpu_hw_sspp_setup_format(struct dpu_sw_pipe 
> *pipe,
>  
>       if (fmt->fetch_mode != MDP_FETCH_LINEAR) {
>               u32 hbb = ctx->ubwc->highest_bank_bit - 13;
> +             u32 ctrl_val;
>  
>               if (MSM_FORMAT_IS_UBWC(fmt))
>                       opmode |= MDSS_MDP_OP_BWC_EN;
> @@ -286,30 +287,31 @@ static void dpu_hw_sspp_setup_format(struct dpu_sw_pipe 
> *pipe,
>               DPU_REG_WRITE(c, SSPP_FETCH_CONFIG,
>                       DPU_FETCH_CONFIG_RESET_VALUE |
>                       hbb << 18);
> -             switch (ctx->ubwc->ubwc_enc_version) {
> -             case UBWC_1_0:
> +
> +             if (ctx->ubwc->ubwc_enc_version == UBWC_1_0) {
>                       fast_clear = fmt->alpha_enable ? BIT(31) : 0;
> -                     DPU_REG_WRITE(c, ubwc_static_ctrl_off,
> -                                     fast_clear | (ctx->ubwc->ubwc_swizzle & 
> 0x1) |
> -                                     BIT(8) |
> -                                     (hbb << 4));
> -                     break;
> -             case UBWC_2_0:
> +                     ctrl_val = fast_clear | (ctx->ubwc->ubwc_swizzle & 0x1) 
> |
> +                             BIT(8) | (hbb << 4);
> +             } else if (ctx->ubwc->ubwc_enc_version == UBWC_2_0) {
>                       fast_clear = fmt->alpha_enable ? BIT(31) : 0;
> -                     DPU_REG_WRITE(c, ubwc_static_ctrl_off,
> -                                     fast_clear | (ctx->ubwc->ubwc_swizzle) |
> -                                     (hbb << 4));
> -                     break;
> -             case UBWC_3_0:
> -                     DPU_REG_WRITE(c, ubwc_static_ctrl_off,
> -                                     BIT(30) | (ctx->ubwc->ubwc_swizzle) |
> -                                     (hbb << 4));
> -                     break;
> -             case UBWC_4_0:
> -                     DPU_REG_WRITE(c, ubwc_static_ctrl_off,
> -                                     MSM_FORMAT_IS_YUV(fmt) ? 0 : BIT(30));
> -                     break;
> +                     ctrl_val = fast_clear | ctx->ubwc->ubwc_swizzle | (hbb 
> << 4);
> +             } else if (ctx->ubwc->ubwc_enc_version == UBWC_3_0) {
> +                     ctrl_val = BIT(30) | (ctx->ubwc->ubwc_swizzle) | (hbb 
> << 4);
> +             } else if (ctx->ubwc->ubwc_enc_version == UBWC_4_0) {
> +                     ctrl_val = MSM_FORMAT_IS_YUV(fmt) ? 0 : BIT(30);
> +             } else if (ctx->ubwc->ubwc_enc_version <= UBWC_6_0) {
> +                     if (MSM_FORMAT_IS_YUV(fmt))
> +                             ctrl_val = 0;
> +                     else if (MSM_FORMAT_IS_DX(fmt)) /* or FP16, but it's 
> unsupported */
> +                             ctrl_val = BIT(30);
> +                     else
> +                             ctrl_val = BIT(30) | BIT(31);

Can we name these magic bits?

There's 2 more bitfields that I see downstream sets here (but it
doesn't claim to support UBWC6).. 

Konrad

Reply via email to