On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 07:28:21PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > On Mon Jan 26, 2026 at 7:01 PM JST, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > > Hi > > > > Am 26.01.26 um 09:17 schrieb pengfuyuan: > >> This patch series adds Rust bindings and safe abstractions for the Linux > >> framebuffer subsystem, enabling framebuffer drivers to be implemented in > >> Rust. > > > > The framebuffer subsystem is obsolete and has been deprecated for a > > decade. No new drivers accepted. Anything that really wants fbdev > > already has a driver. Can we please let it die? > > This, and the patchset is also obviously AI-generated.
Hi, Thank you for the feedback. I’d like to be clear about how I used AI in this work: 1.Cover letter – Yes, I used AI to help summarize and phrase the cover letter. 2.Comments in the code – Some comments were written or refined with AI assistance. 3.Learning the codebase – When reading and understanding existing Rust-for-Linux code (including DRM and other abstractions), I used AI as a helper to analyze and explain structure and patterns. 4.Writing the code – The implementation was not fully generated by AI. I wrote the code myself and used AI mainly to look up existing abstractions, traits, and APIs (e.g. “how does X work? ”, “what’s the right trait for Y?”) while I was coding. So: AI was used for summaries, comments, learning, and looking things up; the logic and structure of the code are mine, and I take responsibility for them. If you have concerns about specific parts (e.g. wording, style, or design), I’m happy to rework those patches or to adjust how I describe tool use in future submissions. Thanks, pengfuyuan
