On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 12:46:41PM +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 11:28 AM Alexandre Courbot <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> >
> > This, and the patchset is also obviously AI-generated.
> 
> pengfuyuan: the generated content guidelines I mentioned earlier this
> month in another of your patches have been merged now, please read:
> 
>     https://docs.kernel.org/next/process/generated-content.html
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Cheers,
> Miguel

Hi Miguel,

Thank you for the pointer. I've read the generated content guidelines at
https://docs.kernel.org/next/process/generated-content.html and will follow
them.

For transparency, here is the disclosure for my contribution:

Tools used:
- Cursor (IDE) with Claude Sonnet 4.5

Parts affected by tool use:
- Cover letter: The cover letter text was summarized/written with AI assistance.
- Code comments: Comments in the code were written with AI assistance.
- Learning and development: I used AI to help analyze existing Rust for Linux
  framework code (e.g. rust/kernel/drm and similar abstractions) and to look
  up existing traits/abstractions while writing the code. The code itself was
  not fully AI-generated; I wrote it with AI used as an aid for querying
  existing abstractions and patterns.

Testing:
- I tested on a real ARM64 machine, manually swapping six different
  graphics cards to verify the changes.

I understand and can explain the code I submit, and I'm prepared to respond
to review comments.

Thanks,
pengfuyuan

Reply via email to